Saturday, August 1, 2015

Exciting July for Gold, Greece, & China


  • Gold 5-year low
  • Greece exited the Euro almost
  • Chinese stock market crash
  • Falling commodity prices
  • US stock market prediction

Gold 5-year low

The gold price closed on July 24, 2015 at $1,098 per troy ounce after hitting a low of $1,072. This was a 5-year low! It caught my attention, so I decided to blog about it.

An article in the Financial Times dated July 25 covered this topic. Some key points were as follows:

  • Goldman Sachs, one of the most influential banks in commodity trading, cautioned in the week ending July 26 that it expected gold to fall below $1,000.

  • Julian Jessop of Capital Economics says that gold may return to levels of about $850 as the Fed moves toward raising interest rates (which is expected for September or December this year). An $850 price level was last seen in 2007.

  • Predicting where the gold price may bottom is difficult because gold isn't like metals which have industrial uses such as copper and zinc.

  • Gold bugs believe that China is not being truthful about how much gold it has bought. Whereas its official gold holdings stand at 1,658 tonnes, gold bugs believe that it actually holds an amount closer to those of Germany at 3,444 tonnes. (China recently reported an increase of about 600 tonnes which was much less than expected by pundits.)

  • Texas-based former stockbroker Bill Holter is bullish on gold. He says, "I can calculate on the back of a napkin that China is buying more gold." He adds that import data support his view. [Someone ought to verify this, please!] "Mathematically, [the world's current build up of debt] is guaranteed [to pop], it is just a question on when." 
-------------------

Bill Holter publishes here.


By using Google search, Bill Holter led me to Jim Sinclair who led me to Canadian billionaire Eric Sprott, all gold bugs. Eric Sprott said recently, "The demand numbers I’ve seen are way beyond the supply." Source.



Greece exited the Euro almost

It was on the weekend of June 27/28 that Greece surprised the world by announcing that it would hold a referendum and let its citizens decide on whether it should accept its creditors terms.  This was instead of Greece reaching an agreement with its creditors before a June-end deadline.

On Sunday, June 28, equity futures around the globe were trading down more than 3%. On Monday, June 29, the S&P500 closed down 2.1% from the previous Friday's close. It was also the first day of a week-long bank holiday in Greece.

The Greek banks ended up remaining closed not for one week as originally announced but for a total of three weeks (through July 19). See timeline here. In the interim, capital controls were imposed (€60/day withdrawal limit; most foreign transfers banned.)

It is in this context that the price of gold hit a 5-year low.  Actually, it hit its low in the first week after the Greek banks reopened, with the actual low occurring on Friday, July 24.

On July 23, the Greek parliament approved the agreement reached between Greece and its creditors. The Financial Times reported that Greece swallowed harsher terms than what was on the table prior to the referendum! 

The sequence of events was bewildering. First, the Greek leaders rejected the creditors' terms and opted for a referendum to decide whether or not they should accept the creditors' terms. Greek citizens voted in favor of rejecting those terms. Then Greece ended up accepting harsher terms than had been on the table prior to the referendum. 

To those who say that Greece is a small economy and it doesn't matter whether it stays or leaves the Euro currency, Bill Holter responded that there have been insurance contracts taken out in the form of credit default swaps (CDS) whose notional value is 10 times that of the entire Greek debt to foreign creditors. If Greece were to leave the Euro currency, it would probably also default on this debt. If it were to default, then these credit default swaps would have to be paid upon. The critical point is that it's not clear whether the issuer(s) of these CDSs would have enough capital to be able to pay. That's when there could be another massive financial crisis. 

Technically speaking, Greece didn't default on its debt on or about June 30 and none of the CDSs were triggered. But practically speaking, Bill Holter says that it did default because although it did make the required interest payments, it made them later than their due date.

So, the context was one of fear and uncertainty in my opinion. Yet gold responded counter-intuitively and went down ... Why? Time will tell.

-------------------

Background: Link to "How does a CDS work?"

Size of Greece's national debt is $300bn. Source. Size of Germany's national debt is over $2tn and is the 3rd highest in the European Union behind UK and Italy. The European nations with the highest absolute national debt amounts are UK, Italy, Germany, and France, each with more than $2tn of debt. Figures are as of Q1 2015. Source.



China stock market bubble burst

The Chinese A-shares stock market as represented by the Shanghai Composite Index hit a seven-year high on June 12.  This represented a rise of more than 2.5 times since the low point hit in January 2014 (18 months prior). From June 12, the index went on to fall 35% by July 9; see chart.

Chinese authorities then stepped in to pump up the stock market through draconian measures including banning short-selling, injecting capital by lending to brokers to support shares, and halting trading outright. Shares rose 11% by July 23 only to reverse course and fall again. As of July 31st's close, the Shanghai Composite stood 1% below the low point hit on July 9.

The selloff through July 9 had wiped out $3 trillion in value. Chinese authorities' failed bailout originally required $19.4 billion of capital. Source. This figure had risen to $350 billion by July 31, according to the Financial Times. Correction, Aug. 8, 2015: The $350 billion is incorrect! The Financial Times reported on Aug. 7 that Chinese authorities had already spent $144 billion out of a $322 billion war chest.

-------------------

The other major stock market in China is represented by the Shenzhen Composite Index. Chinese shares traded in Shanghai and Shenzen are also known as A-shares. By law, they aren't available to foreigners for purchase. (However, foreigners can set up local operations to buy A-shares; one example is US hedge fund Citadel.)



Commodity prices are falling

In the same week that gold hit a 5-year low (July 19-25), the Financial Times reported on falling commodity prices. The general reasons seem to be lack of demand, too much supply, slowing global growth, and expectations for a rising US dollar.

The fall of crude oil was exasperated due to expectations of Iran supplying oil to the international markets in the aftermath of its historic nuclear accord reached on July 14.





Timeline summary

Sat, June 27: Greece announces plans for a referendum to be held on July 5
Mon, June 29: Greek bank holiday begins
Sun, July 5: Greek referendum is held; Greek citizens reject the creditors' measures
Wed, July 8: Chinese A-shares stock index ends 35% below its peak of June 8
Tues, July 14: Iran reaches historic nuclear accord with G5+1 countries
Sun, July 19: Greek bank holiday ends
Thurs, July 23; Greece agrees to creditors' bailout terms
Fri, July 24; Gold hits a 5-year low

Footnote: I am not implying any causality between events in Greece, China, and commodity prices. I am merely pointing out coincidences.



US stock market prediction

I was looking at some stock charts and couldn't help but notice the coincidence involving the date June 29 which was pointed out in the above timeline. The chart below shows the percentage of stocks in the S&P500 trading above their 200-day moving average. It is a weekly chart and its most recent observation is for the last week in July.

The observation is that for the week starting Monday, June 29, this percentage fell below 60% and hasn't recovered since.

The blue arrow points to the bar for the week of Monday, June 29. Note that in October 2014, when this metric fell through the 60% level, it recovered after two weeks. This hasn't happened since June 29!

Because the x-axis spans two and a half years, we are currently experiencing something that has happened for the first time in two and a half years! What I'm trying to say is that it can't be taken lightly.




The following chart shows the S&P500 itself. This is also a weekly chart. Like the chart above, its most recent observation is for the last week in July.

In contrast to the chart above, this chart doesn't show any deterioration except for a flattening of the uptrend since May.

I look at this chart and I don't worry, but I look at the previous chart and I start worrying ... Due to the fact that the chart above has low points that are spaced 9 months apart (Feb. 2014, Oct, 2014, July 2015), I would speculate that if this pattern were to repeat, we'd have another low point in 9 months which would be ... March 2016.






Author is also on Twitter.

Wednesday, July 29, 2015

US Household Income Growth

by Income Bracket



How is the distribution of US household income growth different from other developed countries?

See the chart below for the answer.




What does this mean? 

Here's how I believe the above chart was produced. They measured household income in 1976 for every household in the US and summed up the figures. They then measured the same quantity in 2007 and adjusted it for inflation. Next, they calculated the difference between these two quantities and called it "income growth" across all households. Finally, they asked, how much of this income growth belongs to households in the bottom 90% of income, to households in the next 9%, and finally to those in the top 1%? The answer is what got plotted in the chart. 

The chart shows that in the US, about 20% of income growth in 1976-2007 belongs to households in the bottom 90% of income. (To understand what this means, the number 20% should be replaced with "small" while the number 90% should be replaced with "large".) At the other extreme, in Denmark, about 90% of income growth belongs to households in the bottom 90% bracket.

The flip side would be to compare income growth belonging to the top 1% bracket and the next 9% bracket ... The chart speaks for itself. The top 1% of households by income captured more than 40% of income growth while the next 9% captured almost 40% of income growth.

To put it in words, income growth in the US has predominantly gone to the top 10% of households. It has been narrowly distributed; actually, more narrowly distributed than in any of the other countries in the above chart. The country where income growth has benefited the largest percentage of households is Denmark.

In a nutshell, the chart presents countries in sorted order where the ordering starts with the country where income growth has benefited the largest percentage of households (Denmark) and ends with the country where income growth has benefited the smallest percentage of households (US).

What is the next chart about?

The chart below shows real median household income in the US by year. We can see that real median household income in 2013 was about $52,000 versus about $47,000 in 1985. This is an increase of 10.6% over 28 years and represents a small increase. 

The reason it represents a small increase is because when this 10.6% is annualized, it corresponds to a 0.36% compounded annual growth rate. This is a real growth rate, i.e. it has been adjusted for inflation. What it says is that the median household income has essentially been flat over the 28 years ending in 2013.

"Median" household income is that level of income such that half of households have a lower income than the median while the other half have a higher income. It represents a convenient (and meaningful) way to talk about a single, representative household in any society where household income happens to be distributed across a wide spectrum.





The above charts were excerpted from an article that appeared on ft.com on July 24, 2015 and was entitled "US income inequality rises up political agenda".

---------------

Sanity check: 

I wonder why the first chart leaves out Germany and Italy which are major European countries. Also missing is Japan even though it represents one of the top economies of the world. 

Second, it would have been interesting if that chart has also included some of the countries from emerging markets such as China, India, Russia, and Brazil. I will venture to guess that there, income growth is even more narrowly distributed than the US ... 

Third, notice that the bottom 5 countries on the first chart are all English speaking countries.

The second chart actually shows that US real median household income has been falling since 1999 (except for a brief rise in 2005-2007)! The more nuanced way to interpret the second chart would be to notice that median household income has grown in waves: The first wave was from 1985-1995 during which US real median household income grew. The second wave was from 1995-2005 during which it grew again and this time much more than the previous time. The third wave was from 2005 onward during which it has not grown but fallen!




Author is also on Twitter.

Sunday, July 26, 2015

What Nelson Mandela said to the Prison Officer


The following was recounted by African National Congress (ANC) stalwart Mac Maharaj who spent 12 years in prison plotting with Nelson Mandela; as excerpted from an article published by the Financial Times on July 25, p. 17 of the Life & Arts section.

---------------

Mac recalls Mandela raising prisoners' complaints with General Steyn, the visiting head of correctional services, "an extremely polite man ... in a black suit with a hat, spotless white shirt ... General Steyn turns around and says, 'Mr. Mandela, you are not in a five-star hotel, you are in prison.' And I'm listening and saying, 'Oh boy, that man is in trouble.' Mandela says, 'General, you and I are at war. In a war nobody can predict who is going to win, but one thing we know, that at the end of the day we will have to meet, even if it is for you to accept my surrender. How that happens will be determined by how we treat each other.' Steyn changed overnight."

---------------

Mac Maharaj is now 80 and one of the last survivors of the "golden" generation of Robben Islanders (the prison). Before his 12 years on Robben Island he suffered appalling torture at the hands of the police, including being suspended by one ankle out of a seventh-floor window.

He holds a unique record as confidant of three of the last four ANC party leaders (including Nelson Mandela). He first embraced liberation politics in the 1950s.




Author is also on Twitter


Tuesday, June 23, 2015

That Little Piece of Glass


If someone time traveled from 1990 (let alone from 1900) to 2015 and was asked to describe the difference between then and now, they might report back:

"Well, people don't use light bulbs any more; they use these things called LED lights, which I guess saves energy, but the light they cast is cold. What else? Teenagers seem to no longer have acne or cavities, cars are much quieter, but the weirdest thing is that everyone everywhere is looking at little pieces of glass they're holding in their hands, and people everywhere have tiny earphones in their ears. And if you do find someone without a piece of glass or earphones, their faces have this pained expression as if to say, 'Where is my little piece of glass?' What could possibly be in or on that piece of glass that could so completely dominate a species in one generation?"

Excerpted from an article appearing in the Financial Times on June 20, 2015, p. 20, Life & Arts section. The article was entitled 'The Prozac Principle' and written by Douglas Coupland, artist in residence at the Google Cultural Institute in Paris. Twitter @dougcoupland



Author is also on Twitter

Sunday, June 21, 2015


US Fed Interest Rate Policy Update


Three months ago, I had written about the US Fed's interest rate policy. (See articles dated March 22, March 27, and April 23.)

Here's an update.

Janet Yellen spoke last week at her quarterly press conference. She advised listeners not to spend time wondering whether the first rate hike will come in "September or December or March".  Instead she advised her audience to concentrate on the pace of the rise in rates and said that the pace would be "gradual".

Her words hint at the possibility that the first rate hike may not occur this year. Prior expectations were for this to occur in September. Prior to that, expectations were for this to occur in June (this very month).

The Fed Funds futures market -- used for hedging purposes -- is implying with virtual certainty that there won't be a rate rise in September. In contrast, at the beginning of this year the futures market was signaling with virtual certainty that there would be a rate rise by then.

The futures market is now signaling a 50-50 chance of a rate rise by the end of the year.

Expectations about the timing of first rate rise continue to get postponed.


Excerpted from a Financial Times article printed on 20 June/21 June, p. 16.


Afterthought:  Bond expert Jeff Gundlach, who is CEO and chief investment officer of Doubleline, doesn't think that the Fed will raise interest rates this year. He shared his mind on June 3. See article here.




Author is also on Twitter




Sunday, May 24, 2015

Concept of Time


"Italians' concept of time is radically different from most people I know in New York, and I'm realizing that I don't have to accomplish 29 things every day, and read the entire New Yorker while drinking my coffee from a paper cup and texting on a treadmill."

Jhumpa Lahiri, 47
Pulitzer-Prize-winning writer


Human Connection


"Here [in Rome at the local food markets], you know the person who bakes your birthday cakes, who makes your salami and cheese every day, and the people who sell everything you put in your body. And they know everything you put into your body because there's this deep, human connection that you create day after day."

Jhumpa Lahiri


Excerpted from Financial Times, 23 May/24 May 2015, page 16 of House & Home FT Weekend.





Author is also on Twitter

Monday, May 4, 2015

Excerpts from Bill Gross' 

Investment Outlook of May 4, 2015

A Sense of An Ending


Here's the link to Bill Gross' investment outlook report of May 4. (Note added on Dec. 5, 2015: They moved the article. Here's another link.)

The following comments stood out for me.

1) "[S]uccessful, neither perma-bearish nor perma-bullish managers have spoken to a “sense of an ending” as well. Stanley Druckenmiller, George Soros, Ray Dalio, Jeremy Grantham, among others warn investors that our 35 year investment supercycle may be exhausted."

2) "Since capital gains have dominated historical returns, investment managers tend to focus on areas where capital gains seem most probable. They fail to consider that mildly levered income as opposed to capital gains will likely be the favored risk / reward alternative."


Author is also on Twitter